Abstract

We tested the hypothesis during the combined challenges of altered inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) and posture changes at lower power output regardless of body position that the vascular conductance (VC) recruitment to the exercising muscle would not limit muscle perfusion and estimated O2 delivery (DO2est). However, in head‐down tilt at the higher power output exercise in hypoxia, the recruitment of VC would have a functional limitation which would restrict muscle blood flow (MBF) leading to a limitation in DO2est with consequent increases in metabolic stress. Ten healthy volunteers repeated plantar flexion contractions at 20% (low power output = LPO) and 30% (higher power output = HPO) of their maximal voluntary contraction in horizontal (HOR), 35° head‐down‐tilt (HDT) and 45° head‐up‐tilt (HUT). Popliteal diameter and muscle blood flow velocity were measured by ultrasound determining MBF. VC was estimated by dividing MBF flow by MPP, and DO2est was estimated by MBF times saturation. LPOHUT in hypoxia was associated with no changes in VC and MBF leading to reduced DO2est. In LPOHDT under hypoxia, despite no apparent functional limitation in the VC recruitment, rise in MBF to maintain DO2est was associated with marked increase in muscle electromyographic activity, indicating greater metabolic stress. In HPOHDT under hypoxia, a functional limitation for the recruitment of VC constrained MBF and DO2est. Elevated muscle electromyographic signal in HPOHDT under hypoxia was consistent with challenged aerobic metabolisms which contributed to a greater increase in the relative stress of the exercise challenge and advance the onset of muscle fatigue.

Highlights

  • Muscle blood flow increases to match the delivery of O2 to the metabolic demand during exercise with constant intensity (Laughlin and Joyner 2003; Walker et al 2007)

  • The post hoc analysis indicated that at lower power output, muscle blood flow (MBF) was higher in lower power output exercise in horizontal (LPOHOR) than lower power output exercise in headdown tilt (LPOHDT) and lower power output exercise in head-up tilt (LPOHUT) in both normoxia and hypoxia (P < 0.05)

  • MBF was not different between LPOHUT and LPOHDT in normoxia, in hypoxia, MBF was lower in LPOHUT than LPOHOR and LPOHDT (P < 0.05, Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Muscle blood flow increases to match the delivery of O2 to the metabolic demand during exercise with constant intensity (Laughlin and Joyner 2003; Walker et al 2007). This matching is accomplished through a combined effect of progressive vasodilatory mechanisms and potential contribution of the muscle pump. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call