Abstract

Simple SummaryInhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications in cancer patients and may cause fatal side effects. The multityrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib represents an important treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as all currently approved second-line treatments have only been approved in sorafenib-experienced patients. However, safety concerns regarding sorafenib treatment in patients with cardiovascular disease have been raised. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the incidence of arterial/venous thromboembolic and bleeding complications in 252 patients with HCC treated with sorafenib. Importantly, the incidence of arterial/venous thromboembolic events was low even though more than half of patients had advanced liver dysfunction and a substantial cardiovascular risk according to Framingham risk score. Bleeding complications occurred in every fifth patient. In conclusion, sorafenib represents a safe treatment option even in patients with an increased cardiovascular risk.VEGF(R)-targeted therapies are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and bleeding, which might be pronounced in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, sorafenib represents an important treatment option in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively investigated the risk of arterial/venous thromboembolic and bleeding events in 252 patients treated with sorafenib for HCC between 05/2006 and 03/2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. Cardiovascular risk was assessed using Framingham score. Eight patients (3.2%) experienced 11 arterial/venous thromboembolic events. Only two patients (0.8%) developed arterial thromboembolism even though cardiovascular risk was low, intermediate, and high in 15 (8.7%), 104 (60%), and 54 (31.2%) of 173 assessable patients. Median overall survival (OS) was shorter in the high risk vs. low/intermediate risk group 7.4 (95% CI: 3.4–11.3) vs. 10.0 (95% CI: 6.8–13.2 months) and independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis HR: 1.53 (95% CI: 1.07–2.19; p = 0.019). Forty-eight (19%) patients experienced a bleeding, most commonly gastrointestinal bleeding (14%) followed by epistaxis (4.7%). Advanced liver dysfunction was not associated with an increased incidence of bleeding/venous thromboembolism. Sorafenib represents a safe treatment option even in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Bleeding complications were comparable with previous reports, even though patients with more advanced liver disease were included.

Highlights

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of primary liver cancers and represents the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide [1,2]

  • The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of bleeding events as well as arterial and venous thromboembolic complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib in a large, unselected real-world cohort

  • The incidence of cardiac ischemia/infarction was significantly higher in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with sorafenib when compared to placebo (4.9% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.01) [18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of primary liver cancers and represents the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide [1,2]. Most HCC cases (80–90%) develop in patients with underlying liver cirrhosis [3,4]. Despite clear screening recommendations [2], HCC is still often detected in advanced stages, where palliative treatment with systemic therapy is the only available option [5]. Sorafenib will still play a crucial role in the treatment algorithm of HCC, as all currently approved second-line treatments (regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab) have been approved in sorafenib-experienced patients [5,10,11,12,13] Lenvatinib was shown non-inferior to sorafenib [6], and even more importantly, the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab improved both co-primary endpoints overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib, and will become the new frontline treatment [7,8,9].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.