Various Options for Scrotal Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study.

Abstract

BackgroundScrotal defects in developing countries are common challenges for the reconstructive surgeon and hence this work has been done with the aim to compare the outcome, advantages and disadvantages of different modalities of scrotal reconstruction.MethodsThe prospective observational hospital-based study of reconstruction of scrotal defects following trauma and Fournier’s gangrene was done over a period of three years. Scrotal defect reconstruction was done in 35 patients by scrotal advancement flap, split thickness skin grafting, medial thigh flap, anterolateral thigh flap and groin flap keeping in mind the various indication of different modalities. The reconstructed scrotums were observed for flap survival and skin graft intake for seven to 10 days in the hospital and then were followed for three months in a follow-up clinic.Results and observationsThe mean age of our patients was 48.57±5.01 years. Most of the soft tissue defects of the scrotum were post-traumatic (83%). Scrotal reconstruction was done often by flaps and more frequently used flap for reconstruction of scrotum was scrotal advancement flap. All flaps and grafts survived well. Mean hospitalization time was highest for groin flap cover whereas mean operative time was highest for anterolateral thigh flap cover.ConclusionEvery case of scrotal defect needs an individual approach for scrotal reconstruction depending upon patient age, general condition of the patient, wound status, and the patient’s requirement.