Abstract
The current global financial and economic crisis has led to widespread calls for multilateral policy co-ordination. However, national strategies towards financial market regulation and domestic stimulus programmes considerably diverge in cross-country comparison. Why do policy reactions to the crisis differ? Following a societal approach to preference formation, I argue that national strategies are strongly shaped by value-based ideas and by sectoral interests. While ideas on the role of politics in governing the economy can, for example, lean more towards trust in market forces or instead favour governmental regulation, interests may influence governmental positions according to the economic relevance of the respective sector. An analysis of the discourse and the measures regarding stimulus packages and financial market regulation in Britain and Germany supports this argument and shows that ideas as expectations, institutionalised ideas and material interests reinforced one another in influencing governmental strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
