Abstract
As competition has increased worldwide, national corporations have recombined the best elements of input across national borders. However, unlike the denationalisation views of neoliberalism and leftist global capitalism school, this paper, based on the Korean experience, holds that patterns of globalisation differ widely. The comparative institutionalist views, including the (post-)Varieties of Capitalism and Comparative Capitalism schools, hold that exposure to globalisation reinforces rather than disrupts national economic models. However, Korea changed its traditional development model in the course of its core firms’ internationalisation by building new collaborative interfirm relations at home and nationally oriented networks on foreign soil. To examine the causes of diverse patterns of globalisation and co-evolutionary reconstitution of national economies, this paper emphasises the agency of key actors—particularly governments and lead firms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of International Relations and Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.