Abstract

Although modified radical neck dissections have increased in popularity to reduce morbidity secondary to intraoperative accessory nerve damage, inadvertent injury still often occurs. As this phenomenon is thought to be due to anatomic variation in the trapezius branch of the accessory nerve, it is imperative to better understand the nuances of these anatomic variations to better inform surgical decision-making. A total of 24 accessory nerves were dissected, exposed, and traced in 15 cadavers. Three aspects of the accessory nerve were identified and recorded: the course of the trapezius branch in relation to the sternocleidomastoid, the number of trapezius branches at muscle insertion, and the number of cervical rootlet contributions. Four different anatomic patterns for the trapezius branch were identified, with the most common being where the trapezius branch separates from the main accessory nerve just medial to the sternocleidomastoid and courses deep to the sternocleidomastoid (58.3%). Most (75%) trapezius branches entered the muscle as a single nerve, whereas some (21%) were inserted as two separate nerves. The number of cervical rootlet contributions for each trapezius branch varied from zero to three. Bilateral anatomic variations were also noted. Even when the accessory nerve and its branches are thought to be spared during neck dissection, patients may postoperatively present with different degrees of accessory nerve damage. There may be unrecognized anatomic pathways that the nerve takes that may confer a higher risk of unintentional damage, especially those that have greater exposure within the anterior triangle unprotected by the sternocleidomastoid.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.