Abstract
There is a paucity of research focused on monetary incentives for recruiting dyads (participants with cognitive impairment and study partners) into research. Our objective was to evaluate if two different variations in allocating compensation among dyads changed consent rates in one clinical trial, Memories2. This trial is evaluating cognitive and functional outcomes of obstructive sleep apnea treatment in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Prior to phone screening, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (1) $200 to participant with aMCI or (2) $100 to participant with aMCI and $100 to study partner at consent visit. Allocating all the payment to the participant with aMCI yielded a 2.6% consent rate, while splitting the payment yielded at 1.7% consent rate. We will also discuss how demographic factors affected consent decision by group. This study provides insight into novel strategies that may enhance enrollment of dyads into clinical trials.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
