Abstract

Comparative studies of sympatric species are essential for understanding behavioral and ecological adaptation as well as the mechanisms that can reduce resource competition to allow coexistence. François’ langurs (Trachypithecus francoisi) and Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis) are sympatric primate species found in the limestone seasonal rainforests of Nonggang Nature Reserve, southwestern Guangxi, China. To explore their different adaptation strategies, we collected data on diet using scan sampling at 15-min intervals. Our results revealed that François’ langurs showed a more flexible diet composition than Assamese macaques. François’ langurs increased dietary diversity and mature leaf consumption in response to seasonal scarcity of preferred young leaves and fruits, whereas Assamese macaques relied heavily on young bamboo leaves (Indocalamus calcicolus) in most months. These variations reflect the differences in digestive physiology, morphology, and the temporal and spatial distribution of food resources.

Highlights

  • Comparative studies of sympatric species are essential for understanding behavioral and ecological adaptations, as well as the structure of animal communities (Fleagle et al, 1999; Fleagle, 2013)

  • Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in Lopé Reserve, Gabon, rely on non-fruit foods when succulent fruits are scarce in the dry season, whereas sympatric chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) continue to find and consume considerable quantities of fruit (Tutin & Fernandez, 1993)

  • We identified 92 plant species consumed by François’ langurs and 69 plant species consumed by Assamese macaques

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Comparative studies of sympatric species are essential for understanding behavioral and ecological adaptations, as well as the structure of animal communities (Fleagle et al, 1999; Fleagle, 2013). Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in Lopé Reserve, Gabon, rely on non-fruit foods when succulent fruits are scarce in the dry season, whereas sympatric chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) continue to find and consume considerable quantities of fruit (Tutin & Fernandez, 1993). Many of these variations reflect differences in morphology, digestive physiology, and the temporal and spatial distribution of food resources (Hadi et al, 2012; Nadjafzadeh & Heymann, 2008; Powzyk & Mowry, 2003), and represent ecological niche separation, allowing the coexistence of sympatric primates

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call