Variations in Concurrent Central-Line Use Among Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Patients by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Location Type

Abstract

Background: Current NHSN denominator reporting for central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) counts each patient day with n central lines as 1 central-line day. The NHSN does not directly adjust for potential increased risk of CLABSI from concurrent central lines, but the current NHSN standardized infection ratio (SIR) methods may account for differences in concurrence by adjusting for location type. Objective: We examined differences in central-line concurrence by NHSN location type among CLABSI patients. Methods: In a retrospective cohort of adults with CLABSI at 4 hospitals from 2012 to 2017, we linked central-line data to encounter and CLABSI data. Central lines were considered concurrent if they overlapped for >1 day. We calculated proportion of patients with concurrence at both NHSN location and SIR group levels; risk ratios for concurrence between NHSN location types within each SIR group (ie,, locations defined by SIR models as equal “risk”) were determined. Results: In total, 930 CLABIs were identified from 19 NHSN-defined locations that map to 7 SIR groups. Most CLABSIs occurred in locations mapped to either of 2 SIR groups: wards (227, 16% concurrence) and ICUs (294, 33% concurrence). The ward group had 3 NHSN locations (median, 78 CLABSIs) with concurrence range 8% (medical-surgical ward) to 20% (surgical ward). The ICU group had 6 NHSN locations (median, 47.5 CLABSIs) and concurrence ranged from 20% (neurosurgical ICU) to 39% (medical ICU). Despite the noted variations, no risk ratio was statistically different within each SIR group (Table 1). Conclusions: In patients with CLABSIs, the frequency of concurrence varied up to 2-fold between location types within the current NHSN SIR groups, though not statistically significantly. Assessing whether this difference in magnitude persists in all patients with central lines is an important next step in refining risk adjustment methods to account for concurrent central-line use.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Scott Fridkin reports that his spouse receives consulting fees from the vaccine industry.