Abstract

Hybrid rocket motors have several attracting characteristics such as simplicity, low cost, safety, reliability, environmental friendliness. In particular, hybrid rockets can provide complex and flexible thrust profiles not possible with solid rockets in a simpler way than liquid rockets, controlling only a single fluid. Unfortunately, the drawback of this feature is that the mixture ratio cannot be directly controlled but depends on the specific regression rate law. Therefore, in the general case the mixture ratio changes with time and with throttling. Thrust could also change with time for a fixed oxidizer flow. Moreover, propellant residuals are generated by the mixture ratio shift if the throttling profile is not known in advance. The penalties incurred could be more or less significant depending on the mission profile and requirements. In this paper, some proposed ways to mitigate or eliminate these issues are recalled, quantitatively analysed and compared with the standard case. In particular, the addition of energetic additives to influence the regression rate law, the injection of oxidizer in the post-chamber and the altering-intensity swirling-oxidizer-flow injection are discussed. The first option exploits the pressure dependency of the fuel regression to mitigate the shift during throttling. The other two techniques can control both the mixture ratio and thrust, at least in a certain range, at the expense of an increase of the architecture complexity. Moreover, some other options like pulse width modulation or multi-chamber configuration are also presented. Finally, a review of the techniques to achieve high throttling ratios keeping motor stability and efficiency is also discussed.

Highlights

  • Hybrid rockets have been studied since the ’30s or the thirties but have never come into fruition and their research has been limited compared to the commonly employed solid and liquid technologies [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • One often claimed advantage of hybrid propulsion is to guarantee a similar level of energy management of a liquid rocket like deep throttling and multiple stop–restart on demand, which is much higher than commonly possible with solids, together with a significantly reduced complexity and improved safety compared to liquids [8]

  • 2 Classical Behaviour and Penalties Evaluation. It is well-known that in a classical hybrid rocket the mixture ratio varies with time and throttling, as described in [6, 44]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hybrid rockets have been studied since the ’30s or the thirties but have never come into fruition and their research has been limited compared to the commonly employed solid and liquid technologies [1,2,3,4,5,6]. One often claimed advantage of hybrid propulsion is to guarantee a similar level of energy management of a liquid rocket like deep throttling and multiple stop–restart on demand, which is much higher than commonly possible with solids, together with a significantly reduced complexity and improved safety compared to liquids [8] Several demonstrations of this capability have been performed along the years, starting from Moore [9], continuing with the work at UTC related to target drones and upper stages [10,11,12], followed by AMROC experience [13,14,15,16,17,18] and several NASA-related programs [19,20,21,22]. A review of the techniques to achieve high throttling ratios keeping motor stability and efficiency is presented

Classical Behaviour and Penalties Evaluation
A‐SOFT
Comparison Between AOIM and A‐SOFT
Other Options
Deep Throttling
Simple Fixed Geometry Injector
Dual Manifold
Gas Injection
Variable Area Injector
Gaseous Injection
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call