Abstract

BackgroundThe reaction time-based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) is a memory paradigm used to detect crime-related knowledge. However, this would also imply that the RT-CIT would be vulnerable to factors that are known to compromise object recognition or memory integrity. From this perspective, one key issue is whether “guilty” memory can be detected if the crime-related images are photographed at different angles from what the perpetrator saw, which is almost always the case in the field. To investigate this, here we manipulated the deviation angles, from 0° to 330° in 11 steps, between the study and test phases to assess how the RT-CIT holds up against angular rotations.ResultsWe observed a robust RT-CIT effect at all deviation angles for both deep-encoders (Experiment 1) and shallow-encoders (Experiment 2). The RT-CIT was effective within the first 250 or so trials for both encoding groups, with smaller probe-irrelevant differences beyond that.ConclusionsWith appropriate encoding and memory strength, RT-CIT images do not necessarily have to match the exact angle of the perpetrator’s perspective at the time of the crime. Unnatural angles such as 90° and 270° or unconventional rotational axes may require caution. Trial number under 250 trials show maximal Probe-Irrelevant difference, but more trials may add power to improve detection accuracy.

Highlights

  • The reaction time-based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) is a memory paradigm used to detect crime-related knowledge

  • We found the Reaction time (RT)-CIT to be quite resistant to picture rotations across all angles, and this was true for both deep-encoding (Experiment 1) and shallowencoding (Experiment 2) conditions

  • For deep-encoders, the RT-CIT was most effective under 250 trials, but remained accurate within almost 800 trials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The reaction time-based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) is a memory paradigm used to detect crime-related knowledge. This would imply that the RT-CIT would be vulnerable to factors that are known to compromise object recognition or memory integrity. From this perspective, one key issue is whether “guilty” memory can be detected if the crime-related images are photographed at different angles from what the perpetrator saw, which is almost always the case in the field. The polygraph-based CIT relies on analyzing the suspects’ physiological responses while they hear questions regarding the crime that only the guilty would know the answer to. Only the culprit would be physiologically more responsive to words or pictures that he/she can remember from the crime, thereby producing a larger physiological response on the polygraph (Lykken, 1959)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call