Variation in Vertebral Number in Galaxiid Fishes (Teleostei: Galaxiidae): A Legacy of Life History, Latitude and Length

Abstract

Mean vertebral counts among species of Galaxiidae vary curvilinearly with fish size – large species have more vertebrae (pleomerism). The relationship with size breaks down among adults of diadromous species. There is mostly no relationship between vertebral count and body shape, although an inverse relationship between count and body depth in a series of divergent small galaxiids may reflect a shift in swimming mode. Diadromous populations have more vertebrae than non-diadromous (landlocked) conspecifics (around the same number as related non-diadromous species). Diadromous species have more vertebrae than related non-diadromous species and exhibit rising vertebral number with increasing latitude (Jordan's rule applies). Regressions of vertebral number against latitude differ among conspecific populations from different regions, perhaps reflecting different relationships between latitude and local climate. Differences in counts between diadromous and non-diadromous species are not simply a direct influence of environment on ontogeny, as embryonic development of species/populations undertaking the two distinct life history strategies occurs in similar, freshwater habitats; differences seem likely to be evolved, and to reflect an advantage of higher vertebral counts in marine environments, where diadromous species live as juveniles. This conclusion is supported by correlation between vertebral counts and size of juveniles of diadromous species at return from the sea, suggesting selection for vertebral number during marine life. Overall, vertebral count is thus influenced by a complex amalgam of fish size, life history, and environment. The explanation for pleomerism may well be related to the scaling relationship between length and cross-sectional area (area rises by the square of length increase) leading to increasing stiffness with growth – compensated for in larger species by having more vertebrae. This could also be driven by scaling in the surface area of the articular facets of the vertebrae themselves.