Abstract

Background: Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) protect humans against bites from the Anopheles mosquito vectors that transmit malaria, thereby reducing malaria morbidity and mortality. It has been noted that ITN use leads to a switch from indoor to outdoor feeding among these vectors. It might be expected that outdoor feeding would undermine the effectiveness of ITNs that target indoors vectors, but data are limited. Methods: We linked homestead level geospatial data to clinical surveillance data at a primary healthcare facility in Kilifi County in order to map geographical heterogeneity in ITN effectiveness and observed vector feeding behaviour using landing catches and CDC light traps in six selected areas of varying ITN effectiveness. We quantified the interaction between mosquitoes and humans to evaluate whether outdoor vector biting is a potential explanation for the variation in ITN effectiveness. Results: We observed 37% and 46% visits associated with positive malaria slides among ITN users and non-ITN-users, respectively; ITN use was associated with 32% protection from malaria (crude OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.73). We obtained significant modification of ITN effectiveness by geographical area (p=0.016), and identified significant hotspots using the spatial scan statistic. Majority of mosquitoes were caught outdoor (60%) and were of the An. funestus group (75%). The overall propensity to feed at times when most people are indoor was high; the vast majority of the Anopheles mosquitoes were caught at times when most people are indoor. Estimates for the proportion of human-mosquito contact between the first and last hour when most humans were indoor was consistently high, ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. Conclusion: Our data do not provide evidence of an epidemiological association between microgeographical variations in ITN effectiveness and variations in the microgeographical distribution of outdoor biting.

Highlights

  • Despite the recent scale-up effort to achieve control, malaria continues to cause morbidity and mortality, especially in subSaharan Africa

  • The objectives of this study were (i) to examine whether there has been a shift in vector biting patterns and/or vector behaviour, during the period of intense Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) use along the Kenyan coast; (ii) to test for geographical heterogeneity in ITN effectiveness within the surveillance area of a primary healthcare facility in Kilifi County; and (iii) to assess whether outdoor vector biting is a potential explanation for the variation in ITN effectiveness

  • ITN use was consistently >50% in all geographical areas and the prevalence of ITN use in non-malaria cases was 74.2%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the recent scale-up effort to achieve control, malaria continues to cause morbidity and mortality, especially in subSaharan Africa. The frontline tools for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa, insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spray, are most effective if baseline transmission occurs indoors. The major vectors of human malaria mostly feed indoors, and transmission can be substantially reduced by these tools. Residual malaria transmission is well described even after optimal ITN use, which could be associated with outdoor biting behaviour of the mosquito vector that allows them to evade fatal contact with these frontline tools of intervention. Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) protect humans against bites from the Anopheles mosquito vectors that transmit malaria, thereby reducing malaria morbidity and mortality. The overall propensity to feed at times when most people were asleep was high; the vast majority of the Anopheles mosquitoes were caught at times when most people are indoors asleep. Estimates for the proportion of human-mosquito contact between the first and last hour when most humans were asleep was consistently high across all locations, ranging from 0.83 to version 4 published 03 Dec 2018 report version 3 published 12 Nov 2018 report version 2 published 15 Jan 2018 report version 1 published 30 Mar 2017 report report report report

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call