Abstract

Interest in soil organic carbon (SOC) levels is focused on both soil quality and sequestering carbon from the atmosphere. Farmers have developed minimum tillage systems and no-till systems. This study carefully measured SOC at three sites where long-term, randomized, replicated studies compared minimum tillage and no-till rotations in the low-precipitation inland Pacific Northwest, USA. To overcome seasonal, annual, and rotational effects, a soil sample was taken from each plot monthly for three years. The top 250 kg m-2 dry soil mass (representing the 0- to 20-cm depth) from each core was analyzed for SOC. Averages of monthly samples revealed the tilled treatment had 7.21 g kg-1 of SOC compared to 7.04 for the no-till treatment (p < 0.004). Examining variation month-to-month, 93% of sample variation was due to sample date, and 7% due to blocks (replications) within sites. Of 77 individual site-by-date samples, only six produced significant t-tests (p < 0.05) but SOC differences were 46–31 in favor of tillage and those 46 had larger differences. Power calculations estimated 34–100 samples would be required to detect a relative difference of 5% given the data’s standard deviation. Soil water and soil temperature to 30 cm was measured at the time of sampling, and while no-till more often had greater water, temperature differences were inconsistent. We conclude that no-till did not result in more soil carbon in these systems and judicious tillage is an option for sustainable production.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call