Abstract

Google Scholar is often used to search for medical literature. Numbers of results reported by Google Scholar outperform the numbers reported by traditional databases. How reliable are these numbers? Why are often not all available 1,000 references shown? For several complex search strategies used in systematic review projects, the number of citations and the total number of versions were calculated. Several search strategies were followed over a two-year period, registering fluctuations in reported search results. Changes in numbers of reported search results varied enormously between search strategies and dates. Theories for calculations of the reported and shown number of hits were not proved. The number of hits reported in Google Scholar is an unreliable measure. Therefore, its repeatability is problematic, at least when equal results are needed.

Highlights

  • For several complex search strategies used in systematic review projects, the number of citations and the total number of versions were calculated

  • The number of hits reported in Google Scholar is an unreliable measure

  • Google Scholar is frequently used as a database for biomedical searching, because of its wide and still increasing coverage [1]

Read more

Summary

Methods

For several complex search strategies used in systematic review projects, the number of citations and the total number of versions were calculated. Several search strategies were followed over a two-year period, registering fluctuations in reported search results. At the moment of executing searches for systematic reviews, I meticulously copied the contents of. J Med Libr Assoc 104(2) April 2016. Google Scholar page by page into a MS Word document and performed several calculations (such as the total number of versions and the number of citations) on the contents of each document. I searched a small set of searches at least monthly for more than two years to record the development of the reported number of hits over a longer period of time

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.