Abstract

Abstract Orchid mycorrhiza forms unique symbiotic associations between members of the Orchidaceae and multiple ecological guilds of fungi. Because orchids associate with a wide variety of fungi with different ecological functions, they represent an ideal study system to address fundamental questions about the evolution and ecophysiology of mycorrhizal symbiosis. Although it is well established that shifts in mycorrhizal associations are linked to transitions in plant trophic mode, it remains unclear what ecological drivers promote these evolutionary changes. Here, we investigated mycorrhizal communities and isotope signatures across six populations of the terrestrial orchid Neottia ovata growing under contrasting light conditions in temperate Europe. We hypothesized that plants growing in forests would associate with different mycorrhizal fungi than plants occurring in grasslands and that the limited light availability in forests leads to a higher contribution of fungi to the carbon budget of orchids. Our results showed that N. ovata predominantly associated with rhizoctonia fungi of the family Serendipitaceae in both habitats, but plants in forests also recruited ectomycorrhizal fungi. Root communities highly resembled soil communities and variation in root communities was significantly related to habitat type and edaphic factors. In contrast, isotope signatures (13C, 15N, 2H and 18O) and N concentration showed no significant relationship with habitat type. In addition, both 13C and 2H were not significantly correlated to habitat's light availability. Although it has been suggested that the presence of a wide variety of ectomycorrhizal fungi in root communities of orchids can serve as a precursor for evolutionary shifts to partial mycoheterotrophy (mixotrophy), the presence or absence of ectomycorrhizal fungi did not substantially influence the isotope signatures of N. ovata. These results indicate that rhizoctonia fungi played the major functional role in C and nutrient supply and that ectomycorrhizal fungi did not substantially contribute to the carbon budget of the plants. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call