Abstract

Neotropical wetlands comprise contrasting habitats with highly diverse avifauna, including herbivores, insectivores and carnivores, of both terrestrial and aquatic species. Therefore, comparisons between wetland bird assemblages based only on species identity may disregard turnover within ecological groups, and eclipse important variations between habitat types. We studied bird assemblages from mangrove and estuary habitat types from a coastal lagoon system in Oaxaca, Mexico. For this, we used 640 point counts to obtain data on bird species using those habitats between October 2009 and May 2012. We ascertained guild structure by classifying 139 species in a scalar hierarchy of two-levels: 17 key-resource guilds nested within seven trophic guilds. To evaluate variation in guild structure between habitat types, we contrasted richness and diversity across trophic guilds and tested for variation in abundance within key-resource guilds. We exposed a tendency of greater diversity within terrestrial guilds in mangrove and within aquatic guilds at the estuary. However, these differences were compensatory and neither richness nor diversity varied between habitat types in comparisons across the sets of trophic guilds. Parallel analyses at two hierarchical levels supported the theoretical prediction of greater change at lower levels. Herpetofauna, wood invertebrates, aquatic invertebrates and seeds emerged as dietary components that may explain the distribution of abundance in key-resource guilds. Although the guilds from mangrove and estuary produced comparable sets of richness and diversity values, the actual identity of guilds with high values varied between habitats. On the other hand, species abundance comparisons within guilds pinpointed specific associations with habitat types and this method represents a suitable strategy for identifying habitat preferences in complex wetland bird assemblages.

Highlights

  • Bird assemblages are complex systems containing high numbers of different and interacting elements

  • Hierarchy theory has led to promising developments in community ecology (Kolasa, 1989; Kolasa & Pickett, 1989; Allen & Hoekstra, 1990), to our knowledge, it has not been explicitly applied to guild structure

  • In this study we focus on bird assemblages from two contrasting habitat types using a scalar hierarchy as a conceptual framework and bird guilds as operational sub-units (Blondel, 2003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bird assemblages are complex systems containing high numbers of different and interacting elements. Because trophic guilds are sets of species populations that share broadly similar trophic resources (Burns, 1989), they occupy a higher level in a scalar hierarchy than a set of species sharing one principle resource. We refer to the latter group as a key-resource guild. We used data obtained over 32 months to derive measures of species abundance, guild richness, and guild diversity in both mangrove and estuary These habitat types are distinguished in terms of vegetation and hydrology and we define microhabitats as fine-scale attributes that are used by birds to obtain resources (Fuller, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call