Abstract
ObjectiveTo examine variation in the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in health and age‐related variations in inequalities, according to the socioeconomic status (SES) measure used. MethodsCross‐sectional study involving 205,709 participants in the 45 and Up Study. We used the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) to quantify health inequalities in relation to income, education and Socio‐Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). The outcomes used were heart disease and self‐rated health. Analyses were stratified by age (45–64, 65–79, ≥80 years). ResultsRIIs were largest for income and smallest for SEIFA; they were generally largest in the youngest age group and smallest in the oldest group. Age‐related differences in RIIs were particularly marked for income (e.g. for fair/poor health, RII=11.81, 95%CI 11.14–12.53 in the 45–64 age group and RII=2.42, 95%CI 2.10–2.78 in ≥80 group), and less marked for SEIFA (e.g. respectively, RII=2.68, 95%CI 2.53–2.84 and RII=1.32, 95%CI 1.22–1.44). ConclusionsThe magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in health varies substantially according to the type of SES measure used and age. Income is the most sensitive measure. ImplicationsResearchers and policy makers should be aware of the extent to which SEIFA‐based estimates underestimate the magnitude of health inequality compared to individual‐level measures, especially in younger age groups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.