Abstract

Runners are often categorized as forefoot, midfoot or rearfoot strikers, but how much and why do individuals vary in foot strike patterns when running on level terrain? This study used general linear mixed-effects models to explore both intra- and inter-individual variations in foot strike pattern among 48 Kalenjin-speaking participants from Kenya who varied in age, sex, body mass, height, running history, and habitual use of footwear. High speed video was used to measure lower extremity kinematics at ground contact in the sagittal plane while participants ran down 13 meter-long tracks with three variables independently controlled: speed, track stiffness, and step frequency. 72% of the habitually barefoot and 32% of the habitually shod participants used multiple strike types, with significantly higher levels of foot strike variation among individuals who ran less frequently and who used lower step frequencies. There was no effect of sex, age, height or weight on foot strike angle, but individuals were more likely to midfoot or forefoot strike when they ran on a stiff surface, had a high preferred stride frequency, were habitually barefoot, and had more experience running. It is hypothesized that strike type variation during running, including a more frequent use of forefoot and midfoot strikes, used to be greater before the introduction of cushioned shoes and paved surfaces.

Highlights

  • Runners are commonly categorized according to strike type, and it is widely observed that more than 85% of habitually shod runners typically rearfoot strike (RFS), in which the heel is the first part of the foot to contact the ground [1,2]

  • We asked subjects who varied in terms of the intrinsic and acquired factors described above to perform a set of trials that independently varied three external factors: speed, surface stiffness and step frequency

  • This variation is highlighted by the plot of every Foot strike angle (FSA) recorded in the study (Fig 1), which shows that the average intra-individual standard deviation of FSA was 4.12°, and that while a majority of participants (56%) used a combination of forefoot strike (FFS), midfoot strike (MFS) and RFS landings, 72% of the barefoot runners and 32% of the shod runners used multiple strike types

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Runners are commonly categorized according to strike type ( known as footfall pattern), and it is widely observed that more than 85% of habitually shod runners typically rearfoot strike (RFS), in which the heel is the first part of the foot to contact the ground [1,2]. Some runners (many of them elite athletes) have been observed to forefoot strike (FFS), in which the ball of the foot lands before the heel, or to midfoot strike (MFS), in which the heel. Foot Strike Variation among Habitually Barefoot and Shod Runners (DEL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call