Abstract

Duration of embryonic development, egg size, larval size at hatching, and starvation tolerance of the first zoeal stage were studied in an intertidal crab from the southwestern Atlantic, Neohelice (formerly Chasmagnathus) granulata. These reproductive traits were quantified comparing (a) two populations living in ecologically contrasting coastal habitats in Argentina, a brackish lagoon, Mar Chiquita, MC vs. an open marine habitat near San Antonio, Patagonia, SA, (b) beginning vs. end of the reproductive season, and (c) two temperatures during egg development (18 vs. 27°C). Eggs in an early stage of embryonic development were in both populations larger at the beginning than at the end of the season, and were consistently larger in the SA population. These size differences persisted through larval hatching, independent of the temperature during embryogenesis. At 18°C, eggs produced at the beginning of the season developed in both populations more rapidly than those from the end of the reproductive season, while the opposite trend was observed at 27°C. The stage duration of the zoea I was in both populations shorter at the beginning as compared to the end of the season. The nutritional flexibility of the zoea I stage was compared using as indices the point-of-reserve-saturation (PRS50) and the point-of-no-return (PNR50). The PRS50 was consistently lower in larvae from SA than in those from MC. In the MC population, this index was lower at the beginning than at the end of the season, while no significant seasonal difference was observed in larvae from SA. The PNR50 varied between temperatures of embryonic development and populations, showing also significant interactions between all three factors. The PRS50 was on average lower, and the PNR50 was higher, than values previously reported for N. granulata, suggesting a stronger nutritional flexibility in the larvae used in the present study. Our results indicate significant intraspecific variability among separate populations, seasonal variation, and carry-over effects of environmental conditions prevailing during the embryonic phase, all of which may affect the performance of the larval phase.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call