Abstract

Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. Previous work assessing diagnostic tests is limited, despite their substantial contribution to expenditure. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests ordered across Oxfordshire NHS General Practices, and the proportion of tests that yielded an abnormal result, and identified practices that had a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR results 3 standard deviations below the mean. We estimated the adjusted average proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests that yielded abnormal results from each practice, after adjusting for differences in practice populations. These proportions were plotted against the total CRP and ESR requests per practice. We constructed funnel plots to identify practices 3 standard deviations below the mean proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests. We analysed 143,745 CRP and 30,758 ESR requests from 69 practices. Twelve (17%) and 7 (10%) practices were more than 3 standard deviations below the mean for CRP and ESR testing respectively. Two practices (3%) were below the 99.8% limit for both CRP and ESR ordering. Variation in the proportion of tests with an abnormal result shows promise for auditing variation in care.

Highlights

  • Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care

  • We plotted the crude and adjusted proportion of abnormal C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests requested for each General Practice against the total number of CRP and ESR tests ordered per practice

  • The annual proportion of CRP tests that returned an abnormal result varied from 22% to 42%, whereas the proportion of abnormal ESR tests varied substantially more, from 12% to 41%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Efforts to reduce healthcare costs have led to the development of metrics to identify unwarranted variation in care. We explored C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) tests ordered across Oxfordshire NHS General Practices, and the proportion of tests that yielded an abnormal result, and identified practices that had a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR results 3 standard deviations below the mean. We constructed funnel plots to identify practices 3 standard deviations below the mean proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests. Metrics are currently limited to examining geographical variation in the crude volume of test requests[10,11], and we are aware of no work using data feedback to monitor or modify behaviour. We subsequently identified practices with a proportion of abnormal CRP and ESR tests that was 3 standard deviations below the mean of their colleagues

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call