Abstract

Behavioral differences can be observed between species or populations (variation) or between individuals in a genetically similar population (variability). Here, we investigate genetic differences as a possible source of variation and variability in Drosophila grooming. Grooming confers survival and social benefits. Grooming features of five Drosophila species exposed to a dust irritant were analyzed. Aspects of grooming behavior, such as anterior to posterior progression, were conserved between and within species. However, significant differences in activity levels, proportion of time spent in different cleaning movements, and grooming syntax were identified between species. All species tested showed individual variability in the order and duration of action sequences. Genetic diversity was not found to correlate with grooming variability within a species: melanogaster flies bred to increase or decrease genetic heterogeneity exhibited similar variability in grooming syntax. Individual flies observed on consecutive days also showed grooming sequence variability. Standardization of sensory input using optogenetics reduced but did not eliminate this variability. In aggregate, these data suggest that sequence variability may be a conserved feature of grooming behavior itself. These results also demonstrate that large genetic differences result in distinguishable grooming phenotypes (variation), but that genetic heterogeneity within a population does not necessarily correspond to an increase in the range of grooming behavior (variability).

Highlights

  • By interbreeding or isogenizing melanogaster lab strains, we generated stocks with high and low genetic diversity, but we find that all groups exhibited similar variability in measured grooming features

  • We analyzed fly grooming behavior in five different drosophilid species and four common melanogaster stocks to investigate the relationship between genetic heterogeneity and behavioral variability

  • All flies showed variability in the details of the grooming movement sequence, but increased genetic heterogeneity did not correspond to increased behavioral variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Differences in phenotype arise from differences in genotype. Changes in DNA account for variation in traits among species, and differences between individuals of the same species. Animal behavior contains phenotypes partially under genetic control, and specific genes associated with observable differences in behavior between and within species have been uncovered (Baker et al, 2001; Johanssen, 2014). From endangered species to agricultural crops to virus variants, genetic diversity affects organismal success. Natural variations in DNA sequences produce individual mice that differ in aggression and or flies that implement different foraging strategies (Anderson, 2016; Allen et al, 2017) and advantageous variants can be selected. Mutant screens have uncovered gene variants associated with

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call