Abstract

Objective:The use of antipsychotics to treat seniors in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) has raised concern because of health consequences (i.e., increased risk of falls, stroke, death) in this vulnerable population. This study measured geographic patterns of antipsychotic utilization among seniors living in LTCFs in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and assessed potential inappropriateness.Method:We analyzed prescription records among adults 66 years and older with provincial prescription drug coverage admitted to LTCFs in NL between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2014. Patterns of use were analyzed across the 4 regional health authorities (RHAs) in NL and LTCFs. Logistic, Poisson and linear regression models were used to test variations in prevalence, rate and volume of antipsychotic utilization. To assess potential inappropriateness of antipsychotic use, we analyzed data from Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 forms from NL LTCFs between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Pearson chi-squared analysis was performed at the RHA and LTCF levels to determine changes in percentage of total prescriptions or antipsychotic prescriptions without psychosis.Results:Between 2011 and 2014, 2843 seniors were admitted to LTCFs across NL; of these, 1323 residents were prescribed 1 or more antipsychotics. Within the 3-year period, the percentage of antipsychotic use across facilities ranged from 35% to 78%. Using data from 27,260 RAI-MDS 2.0 assessments between 2016 and 2018, 71% (6995/9851) of antipsychotic prescriptions were potentially inappropriate.Discussion:There is substantial variation across NL regions concerning the utilization of antipsychotics for senior in LTCFs. Facility size and management styles may be reasons for this.Conclusion:With nearly three-quarters of antipsychotic prescriptions shown to be potentially inappropriate, systematic interventions to assess indications for antipsychotic use are warranted. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.

Highlights

  • The high rates of potentially inappropriate antipsychotic prescriptions among seniors have been well documented in Canada and in other parts of the world.[1,2,3] While approximately 5% of community-dwelling seniors receive antipsychotics,[2] the prevalence of antipsychotic prescription in long-term care for 2016-2017 was estimated to be 21% nationally and 38% in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL).[3]

  • Between 2011 and 2014, 2843 seniors were admitted to long-term care facilities (LTCFs) across NL; of these, 1323 residents were prescribed 1 or more antipsychotics

  • A study conducted across multiple states in the United States found that antipsychotic prescription in LTCFs was significantly influenced by region and increased significantly as size of the facility increased.[12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The high rates of potentially inappropriate antipsychotic prescriptions among seniors have been well documented in Canada and in other parts of the world.[1,2,3] While approximately 5% of community-dwelling seniors receive antipsychotics,[2] the prevalence of antipsychotic prescription in long-term care for 2016-2017 was estimated to be 21% nationally and 38% in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL).[3] Many residents in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are prescribed antipsychotics to treat the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.[4] This is despite Health Canada warnings regarding the risks of using atypical antipsychotics in elderly persons. Studies conducted elsewhere in the world have shown substantive variation in prescribing practices for antipsychotics in LTCFs across regions.[6,7,8,9] In Ontario, a study of residents in LTCFs found some variation between the different regions of the province in terms of antipsychotic prescriptions, ranging from 25.4% to 32.4%.10. As of 2014, Manitoba had the lowest rate of the 5 provinces, at 32%, and New Brunswick had the highest rate at over 50%.11 a study conducted across multiple states in the United States found that antipsychotic prescription in LTCFs was significantly influenced by region and increased significantly as size of the facility increased.[12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call