Abstract
For attracting closed sets that are not compact we consider different formulations of input-to-state stability properties and related Lyapunov criteria. In the compact case, there exists a well-established hierarchy of such properties and some formulations have been quickly discarded as equivalent to input-to-state stability. In this paper we show for the noncompact case, several new phenomena appear. In particular, input-to-state stability (ISS) does not imply integral input-to-state stability, and ISS is not equivalent to integral-input-to-integral-state stability. The criteria are formulated in terms of measurement functions, which allows a uniform presentation of a number of related results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
