Abstract
For two realistic (but not real) populations of loblolly pine, variance estimators for weighed regression estimates of total volume are compared. The traditional variance estimators and two robust variance estimators proposed by Royall and Cumberland (R. M. Royall and W. G. Cumberland. 1981. JASA, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76: 924–930) are found to be quite unreliable. In contrast, the jackknife variance estimate and confidence intervals based on it are found to be much more reliable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
