Abstract

We compared two variance components methods for detecting genes that influence time to onset for a complex disease using simulated data. We first divided the extended families into nuclear families. The first method fitted variance components to the martingale residuals, which were obtained from first fitting a proportional hazards model to the time to onset data for the trait, allowing for the quantitative traits Q1-Q5, sex, age, and the environmental factor. The second method treated time to onset among the affected individuals as a quantitative trait adjusting for the same factors as in the first method. Power of these analyses were similar for either approach. However, we found an excess of false-positive results when fitting the martingale residual model or the affected-only model to identify genetic factors linked to chromosome 6. Applying a power transformation to the martingale residuals decreased the type I error rate and increased the power of tests for genetic linkage. We also found that robust variance correction lead to test with a slightly lower type I error rate, perhaps because the robust variance correction adjusts for the fact that we did not specifically model the effects of the mitochondrial factor in our analysis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.