Variable impact of three different antiangiogenic drugs alone or in combination with chemotherapy on multiple bone marrow-derived cell populations involved in angiogenesis and immunity.

Abstract

In contrast to VEGF pathway-targeting antibodies, antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have failed to meet primary endpoints in almost all phase III clinical trials when combined with conventional chemotherapy. One exception is the combination of nintedanib and docetaxel as a second-line therapy for rapidly progressing advanced NSCLC. In addition to increased toxicity caused by this type of combination, thus necessitating drug dose reductions or treatment breaks, such phase III trial failures may also be related to the differential impact of host-mediated responses involving mobilization and tumor infiltration of bone marrow-derived cell populations (BMDCs), comprising both pro-angiogenic as well as immune effector cells. Herein, we evaluated two different antiangiogenic TKIs (sunitinib or nintedanib) and a VEGFR-2 antibody (DC101) either alone or combined with maximum tolerated dose paclitaxel for their differential impact on the BMDC host response, evaluating four different cell types. TKIs (in particular sunitinib) induced myelosuppression similar to paclitaxel, whereas DC101 had no such effect. Sunitinib also significantly decreased the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T and B cells, MDSCs, and macrophages. In contrast, the effect of nintedanib on these BMDC populations was less marked, behaving closer to the VEGFR-2 antibody effects than sunitinib. The results raise the possibility that differences observed between antiangiogenic antibodies and TKIs in increasing chemotherapy efficacy could be related, at least in part, to differential effects on cells associated with local immunity within the tumor microenvironment.