Abstract
Three crystallographically characterized organosamarium complexes containing formally {itx}-coordinate trivalent samarium have been recrystallized under appropriate conditions to give formally {itx} + 1-coordinate species. The structures of these complexes have been determined and are compared with the {itx}-coordinate structures. The implications of this structural flexibility on the steric factors which are very important in organolanthanide reactivity are discussed. Recrystallization of the seven-coordinate dihydroindenoindene diolate complex [(C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}Sm]{in2}O{in2}C{in16}H{in10} ({bd1}) from THF gives the eight-coordinate solvate [(C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}Sm(THF)]{in2}O{in2}C{in16}H{in10} ({bd2}) which crystallizes as a THF solvate in the space group {itP}2{in1}/{itn} with {ita} = 10.811(4), {itb} = 13.878(4), c = 25.114(7) \rA, \gb = 98.77(7)\dg and {itD}{incalc.} = 1.15 g cm{su\t-3} for {itZ} = 2. Least-squares refinement on the basis of 2208 observed reflections led to a final {itR} valueof 0.049. In {bd2}, two (C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}Sm bent metallocene units are coordinated to the O{in2}C{in16}H{in10} framework via SmO bonds of 2.099(9) \rA. Each Sm centre is also ligated by a THF molecule with a SmO distance of 2.490(9) \rA. Both {bd1} and {bd2} have similar O{in2}C{in16}H{in10} units but {bd2} has larger average SmC distances (2.75(2) vs 2.70(3) \rA) and a smaller (ring centroid)Sm(ring centroid) angle (132.9 vs 139.8\dg). Recrystallization of [(C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}Sm]{in2}(\gm-O) ({bd3}) from toluene in the presence of {bdCNCMe}{in3}, forms [(C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}Sm(CNCMe{in3})]{in2}(\gm-O) ({bd4}) which crystallizes in the space group {itP}2{in1}/{itc} with {ita} = 27.265(10), {itb} = 13.946(5), {itc} = 15.505(5)\rA, \gb = 101.25(3)\dg and {itD}{incalc.} = 1.28 g cm{su\t-3} for {itZ} = 4. Least-squares refinement on the basis of 8275 observed reflections led to a final {itR} value of 0.064. Like {bd3}, {bd4} has short SmO distances, 2.101(7) \rA, and a nearly linear (174.3(4)\dg) SmOSm angle. {bd4} has a larger SmC(ring) average (2.80(1) vs 2.73(1) \rA) and a smaller (ring centroid)Sm(ring centroid) angle (133.5 vs 137.2\dg). Recrystallization of (C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}SmI(THF) ({bd5}) in the presence of one equivalent of 1,5-pentamethylenetetrazole (C{in6}H{in10}N{in4}) gives the complex (C{in5}Me{in5}){in2}SmI(C{in6}H{in10}N{in4}) ({bd6}) which crystallizes in space group {itP}2{in1}/{ita} with {ita} = 15.969(10), {itb} = 10.741(10), {itc} = 17.768(7)\rA, \gb = 108.81(4)\dg and {itD}{incalc.} = 1.58 g cm{su\t-3} for {itZ} = 4. Least-squares refinement on the basis of 3327 observed reflections led to a final {itR} value of 0.061. In addition to the attachments of the two C{in5}Me{in5} rings and the iodide ligand to Sm, two of the nitrogen atoms of the tetrazole ligand are oriented towards the metal at distances of 2.539(14) and 2.812(18) \rA. The Sm(ring) average (2.73(2) \rA) in {bd6} is the same as that in {bd5} and the SmI distance is larger (3.100(2) vs 3.048(2) \rA).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have