Abstract

PurposeDermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) has previously demonstrated its utility to assess the bioequivalence (BE) of topical drug products in a clinical study. We aimed to characterize the sources of variability in the dermal pharmacokinetic data from that study.MethodsExploratory statistical analyses were performed with multivariate data from a clinical dOFM-study in 20 healthy adults evaluating the BE, or lack thereof, of Austrian test (T) and U.S. reference (R) acyclovir cream, 5% products.ResultsThe overall variability of logAUC values (CV: 39% for R and 45% for T) was dominated by inter-subject variability (R: 82%, T: 91%) which correlated best with the subject’s skin conductance. Intra-subject variability was 18% (R) and 9% (T) of the overall variability; skin treatment sites or methodological factors did not significantly contribute to that variability.ConclusionsInter-subject variability was the major component of overall variability for acyclovir, and treatment site location did not significantly influence intra-subject variability. These results support a dOFM BE study design with T and R products assessed simultaneously on the same subject, where T and R treatment sites do not necessarily need to be next to each other. Localized variation in skin microstructure may be primarily responsible for intra-subject variability.

Highlights

  • A considerable amount of research has been carried out in recent years to promote new sensitive and discriminating 204 Page 2 of 11Pharm Res (2020) 37: 204 methods for the BE assessment of topical dermatological drug products based on pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints, among them skin stripping, dermal microdialysis and dermal open flow microperfusion [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Our ANOVA results showed inter-subject variability to be the greatest source of variability, with a much smaller proportion of the variability arising from intra-subject variability; the intra-subject variability in our study was low or lower compared to the two previously published dermal microdialysis (dMD) studies [1, 12]

  • The dMD study on topical ketoprofen in 18 subjects did not calculate the relative contributions of inter- and intra-subject variability based on an ANOVA analysis, but the reported coefficient of variation (CV) suggest an intersubject variability of approximately 85% and an intrasubject variability of approximately 15%, i.e. similar to our study [12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pharm Res (2020) 37: 204 methods for the BE assessment of topical dermatological drug products based on pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints, among them skin stripping (tape stripping), dermal microdialysis (dMD) and dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Such methods for topical in vivo permeation studies are promising for BE assessments, the resulting data are highly variable - like most of topical PK data. Results have certain limitations as they are derived mostly from studies on highly penetrating topical drug products performed with limited probe numbers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call