Abstract

A B ST R A C T : Well-cuttings and core samples from four Gulf Coast areas have been examined by high-resolution scanning-transmission electron microscopy and other techniques to detail the chemical, mineralogical and textural changes during diagenesis. Wells in each of the four areas exhibit a distinct smectite-to-illite (S-I) transition, but the estimated depths for the transition vary significantly: 5600 to 8800 ft for the onset of the transition, and 7500 to 13 600 ft for the completion (70-80~ illite). Calculated temperatures also vary significantly: 58 ~ to 92~ for the onset, and 88 ~ to 142~ for the completion. No pattern is evident for characteristic temperatures of the S-I transition. These data suggest that it is inappropriate to use the S-I transition for determining absolute diagenetic temperatures in geological settings similar to Gulf Coast sequences. TEM data imply the presence of two distinctly different kinds of domains, interpreted as smectite (with some mixed-layer component?) and illite. Initially, smectite domains dominate and contain subparallel layers of variable thickness. As the transition proceeds, abundant dislocations provide avenues for diffusion of both necessary reactants (K and A1) and products (Na, Si, Fe, Mg); illite packets grow within a shrinking matrix of smectite. Variable temperatures for the transition may be due to several factors, including chemical heterogeneity of the original smectite, variation in water/rock ratio, porosity differences, diverse chemical character of available fluids, and the particular physical environment for diagenesis. It is suggested that actual depths and temperatures for the transition are primarily a function of kinetic factors associated with a reaction for which at least one of the principal phases is metastable; the transition therefore is highly dependent on local geological factors. We have observed a growing tendency to equate degree of burial diagenesis with an absolute temperature for the smectite-to-illite (S-I) transition: namely, 100~ for completion of the transition with approximately 80% illite within mixed-phase smectite/illite. This temperature apparently has been derived from Hower et al. (1976), who noted that no further changes in the smectite/illite proportions (~ 20/80) occur at temperatures greater than 95~ As to why 100~ has come into common usage, we can only suggest a rounding-up from 95~ to a more familiar value. Building on the work of Powers (1959, 1967), Burst (1969) and Perry & Hower (1970), the classic paper of Hower et al. (1976) caught the attention of clay mineralogists and has been the foundation of intensive investigation up to the present day. Subsequent work by Boles & Franks (1979), Nadeau et al. (1985) and Ahn & Peacor (1986) has added greatly to our understanding of the S-I transition, and although an absolute temperature value has not been explicitly mandated, the concept of a special temperature for the completion of the S-I transition still appears to be entrenched in general usage.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.