Abstract

Objective: This report briefly addresses sources of variability in five different domains of human performance: movement behavior, cognition and learning, performance under displaced feedback, human error performance, and social and team performance. Results: In every case: (1) context specificity makes a key contribution to variability observed with these domains; and (2) a control systems interpretation can be applied to account for the basis of these effects. Conclusion: This analytical approach can readily be extended to other performance domains, such as variability in complex sociotechnical systems. Application: Given that HF/E science is primarily concerned with performance-design interaction, it can be argued that an emphasis on the contribution of design (context) to performance variability has a scientific and practical significance for the field that far exceeds the possible influence of innate biological factors on such variability.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call