Abstract

PurposeTo strengthen our understanding of the impact of baseline variability in mode choice on the likelihood of travel behaviour change.MethodsQuasi-experimental analyses in a cohort study of 450 commuters exposed to a new guided busway with a path for walking and cycling in Cambridge, UK. Exposure to the intervention was defined using the shortest network distance from each participant’s home to the busway. Variability in commuter travel behaviour at baseline was defined using the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, the number of different modes of transport used over a week, and the proportion of trips made by the main (combination of) mode(s). The outcomes were changes in the share of commute trips (i) involving any active travel, (ii) involving any public transport, and (iii) made entirely by car. Variability and change data were derived from a self-reported seven-day record collected before (2009) and after (2012) the intervention. Separate multinomial regression models were estimated to assess the influence of baseline variability on behaviour change, both independently and as an interaction effect with exposure to the intervention.ResultsAll three measures of variability predicted changes in mode share in most models. The effect size for the intervention was slightly strengthened after including variability. Commuters with higher baseline variability were more likely to increase their active mode share (e.g. for HHI: relative risk ratio [RRR] for interaction 3.34, 95% CI 1.41, 7.89) and decrease their car mode share in response to the intervention (e.g. for HHI: RRR 7.50, 95% CI 2.52, 22.34).ConclusionsPeople reporting a higher level of variability in mode choice were more likely to change their travel behaviour following an intervention. Future research should consider such variability as a potential predictor and effect modifier of travel and physical activity behaviour change, and its significance for the design and targeting of interventions.

Highlights

  • Changes in mode of transport have the potential to increase levels of population health

  • Variability in baseline mode choice predicted a change in the share of trips involving any active travel in both directions

  • Higher levels of variability in all indicators predicted a decrease in active travel share (for HHI: relative risk ratio [relative risk ratios (RRR)]: 40.82, 95% confidence interval: 10.63–156.70; for number of modes: 3.23, 2.04–5.12; for proportion main mode: 46.32, 8.10–264.90), as well as an increase in active travel share (Table 5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Changes in mode of transport have the potential to increase levels of population health. Ogilvie / Journal of Transport & Health 3 (2016) 77–85 that mode choice at baseline predicts the use of new transport infrastructure (Goodman et al, 2013). Habits of using a specific mode of transport are a strong correlate of (active) travel behaviour and thought to hinder behaviour change (De Bruijn and Gardner, 2011; Aarts et al, 1998; Bamberg and Schmidt, 2003; Gärling and Axhausen, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call