Abstract
Average evoked response technique was presented as a method useful in the diagnosis of disorders of hearing and language. The variation of the individual evoked responses concealed in the average is a possible limitation of the method's continued clinical acceptability. Characteristics of this variability and three methods amenable for clinical assessment were discussed. It was concluded that average evoked response measurements are inadequate without variance measurements.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
