Abstract

In the production of non-native consonant clusters, speakers’ systematic errors have been attributed to the influence of native-language phonotactics [Dupoux et al. (1999)]. However, recent models of non-native speech production suggest that speakers are also sensitive to acoustic details [Wilson et al. (2012)]. We examine whether speakers’ sensitivity to phonetic detail is modulated by variability in the speech signal, and whether they abstract away from subphonemic detail given sufficient variability. This was tested by presenting English speakers with ill-formed clusters (e.g., bdafa, tmape, zgade) containing systematically manipulated sub-phonemic acoustic properties: stop burst duration and amplitude for stop-initial clusters, and the presence/absence of pre-obstruent voicing (POV) for voiced clusters. In experiment 1, which presented stimuli produced by a single Russian talker, significant effects were found for the duration manipulations on the rates of epenthesis, the amplitude manipulation on consonant change/deletion errors, and the POV manipulation on the rate of prothesis. In experiment 2, which contained stimuli produced by three talkers, there was a substantial attenuation of the influence of the acoustic manipulations on speakers’ productions. These results suggest that an account of non-native speech production that models the relative contribution of phonotactics and phonetic detail must incorporate information about variability in the environment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.