Abstract

Vapour–liquid equilibrium data were measured for the propanoic acid+water system at 423.2, 453.2 and 483.2K from 1.87 to 19.38bar over the entire range of concentrations. An experimental apparatus based on the static–analytical method with sampling of both phases was used with quantitative analysis by GC. The system is highly non-ideal showing azeotropic behaviour. The Peng–Robinson (PR), the cubic plus association (CPA), the perturbed chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) and the PC-polar-SAFT (PCP-SAFT) equations of state modelled the data. Two association sites were assumed for both compounds. A single–binary interaction parameter (kij) was used in all models, and predictive (kij=0) and correlative (kij=kij0+kij1T) capabilities were assessed. Available data at 313.1, 343.2 and 373.1K from the open literature were included in the analysis. PCP-SAFT presented higher predictive and correlative capabilities over the entire temperature range. PC-SAFT in predictive mode was not able to represent the azeotropic behaviour but resulted in the second best correlations. CPA presented a satisfactory balance between the two modes. PR predictions were rather poor but correlations were better than those of CPA, at the expense of a larger kij.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.