Abstract

Over the past couple of decades, there have been various attempts to articulate the value of the arts and cultural industries to the economic, social and cultural life of individuals and communities, and their impact on regional regeneration and national development. With more exacting demands from government funding organisations relating to accountability and impact measurements, the sector’s key cultural bodies and national institutions have searched for more reliable methodologies to support their cases. An increasing number of cultural institutions are now utilising various applications of choice modelling or contingent valuation methodology (CVM) to help justify either continued, or argue for increased, government funding. During 2008-9, the Queensland Museum commissioned a valuation project in an attempt ‘to increase awareness of the cultural, social, intellectual and economic benefits and value of Queensland Museum to the State’. This paper discusses the contingent valuation process undertaken by the Queensland Museum, which is the first such study by a major museum or cultural institution in Australia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.