Abstract
To have meaningful discussion of freedom requires an agreed definition of freedom in non-valuational terms. A number of hypotheses concerning interpersonal freedom are developed, most of which can be tested empirically using psychological, political or historical evidence. All may be considered rules of choices - "rules stipulating conditions under which it is rational for anyone to assign positive (or negative) value to some particular freedom relationship."
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
