Abstract

Prevailing ambiguity regarding concepts of communication often precludes serious consideration of relevant methodology and theory, i.e., problems of a discipline of communication. Noting this, the paper examines organizing principles of a possible discipline of communication, aims of current inquiries into the process, values employed in judging their objectifications, and practical problems encountered in generating knowledge in the field. Rather than promoting a particular framework for the study of communication or emphasizing a specialized problem of improving on a particular communication phenomenon, the paper attempts to develop a general typology for inquiries into communication processes. This typology differentiates among modes and domains of inquiry according to a number of methodological and practical criteria. It suggests that a possible discipline of communication, in order to be viable, should simultaneously employ three separate investigative strategies: a praxiological mode of inquiry, a scientific mode of inquiry and a cybernetic mode of inquiry.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.