Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
This study examines values inherent in qualitative secondary studio art assessment, focusing on Advanced Placement (AP), Arts PROPEL, and International Baccalaureate (IB). Data were generated from criteria for assessment as outlined in the literature and in curriculum materials. Themes emerged which express commonalties and differences. Understanding process is not assessed directly in AP assessment although it is a significant aspect of IB and Arts PROPEL assessments. Sociological, historical, and contextual understanding is an important aspect of IB assessment. Understanding form is assessed directly in AP, Arts PROPEL, and IB assessment, and emerges as a prominent common aesthetic value.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
