Value-based versus usual care for heart failure patients leads to reduction in cost, hospital admissions and improved survival

Abstract

Abstract Background OptumCare (OC) in our city, Nevada established a heart failure (HF) program comprised of a team of outpatient cardiologists including two who are board certified in advanced heart failure. Referred patients are enrolled in the HF program once HF is diagnosed by a cardiologist. Patients are managed by an interdisciplinary team of cardiologists, advanced practice clinicians (APC), registered nurse case managers (RNCM), and a social worker. Patients at higher risk for HF admissions are enrolled in remote patient telemonitoring. In contrast, OC in Arizona utilizes a "usual" care approach of fee-for-service contracted cardiology groups to manage HF patients in outpatient and in-patient settings. Purpose A head-to-head comparison was performed between the cohort of patients enrolled in HF program in OC Nevada (treatment group) and patients with HF diagnosis in OC Arizona (control group). The groups were compared on the following measures: medical cost, hospital admissions, and survival rates. Methods In this retrospective study, a 1:1 iterative propensity score (PS) matching was performed to closely approximate patient demographics and comorbidities, which resulted in 818 matched pairs (total n=1,636) of the patients with program enrollment or 1st HF diagnosis between March 1, 2019 and June 30, 2022. For Difference-in-Difference Analysis (Diff-in-Diff), generalized linear models were used on PS matched data to test the difference in difference in medical cost and utilizations changes between control and treatment group over a six month period. Log-Binomial regression was used to estimate the relative risk of post period 30-day readmission and hospice enrollment. Kaplan Meier Estimator was used to test the difference in survival rates over time. Results Average age of patients was 77.6 years old, and 49% were female. The treatment group resulted in significantly lower overall medical costs per member per month (PMPM), significantly less emergency room (ER) visits, less acute hospital and skilled nursing facility (SNF) admissions, and shorter overall hospital length of stays. The control group was twice as likely to be readmitted to the hospital. Lastly, the treatment group had a significantly better survival rate than the control group. 19% of the patients in the control group expired within 12 months of enrollment vs. 10% of the patients in the treatment group expired during the same time period. Average survival was 142 days in the control group vs. 200 days in the treatment group. Conclusions A value-based care approach involving a multidisciplinary team in an outpatient-based cardiology HF program resulted in statistically significant improvement in medical costs, acute care visits/admissions, and survival rates compared to "usual" care approach for HF patients.