Abstract

The main fora for the adjudication of customary-law cases on a daily basis are the courts of chiefs (senior traditional leaders) and headmen (the so-called traditional courts) which were given recognition by the Black Administration Act. Section 12 of the Act conferred civil jurisdiction on designated chiefs (or senior traditional leaders) and headmen to hear cases arising out of Black law and custom, whereas criminal jurisdiction was regulated by section 20 of the same. It is the purpose of this note to consider the jurisdiction of these courts in so far as it relates to their judgments, or, in other words, the imposition of sanctions or orders. This will be followed by a consideration of the orders or sanctions that may be given by traditional courts in terms of section 10 of the Traditional Courts Bill. The note will be concluded by a discussion of the nature of customary sanctions, taking into account the current (official) law, proposed law (in terms of the Traditional Courts Bill) as well as the living law.For purposes of the discussion, the imposition of sanctions by courts with civil jurisdiction will be emphasized and used as examples. To reflect the living law, regard will be had to a number of case studies compiled by Prof FA de Villiers, former professor of law at the University of the Western Cape (information obtained from and used with permission of the researcher). The case studies were recorded from official reports of chiefs‟ court judgments from 1995-2004 of the BaNkuna traditional authority to the Magistrates‟ Court with concurrent jurisdiction, Limpopo Province.

Highlights

  • The main fora for the adjudication of customary-law cases on a daily basis are the courts of chiefs and headmen which were given recognition by the Black Administration Act (38 of 1927; and Koyana “Customary Law and the Role of Customary Courts Today” 1997 Consultus 126 127)

  • It is the purpose of this note to consider the jurisdiction of these courts in so far as it relates to their judgments, or, in other words, the imposition of sanctions or orders. This will be followed by a consideration of the orders or sanctions that may be given by traditional courts in terms of section 10 of the Traditional Courts Bill ([B1‒2012])

  • The note will be concluded by a discussion of the nature of customary sanctions, taking into account the current law, proposed law as well as the living law

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main fora for the adjudication of customary-law cases on a daily basis are the courts of chiefs (senior traditional leaders) and headmen (the socalled traditional courts) which were given recognition by the Black Administration Act (38 of 1927; and Koyana “Customary Law and the Role of Customary Courts Today” 1997 Consultus 126 127). It is the purpose of this note to consider the jurisdiction of these courts in so far as it relates to their judgments, or, in other words, the imposition of sanctions or orders. The case studies were recorded from official reports of chiefs‟ court judgments from 1995-2004 of the BaNkuna traditional authority to the Magistrates‟ Court with concurrent jurisdiction, Limpopo Province (reports in terms of R 6 of GG 1929 GN R2082)

Applicable legislation
Legislation unpacked
Case studies
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.