Value of virtual non-contrast images to identify uncomplicated cystic renal lesions: photon-counting detector CT vs. dual-energy integrating detector CT

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the value of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) derived virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions to identify renal cysts in comparison with conventional dual-energy integrating detector (DE EID) CT-derived VNC reconstructions.Material and methodsWe prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with simple renal cysts (Bosniak classification—Version 2019, density ≤ 20 HU and/or enhancement ≤ 20 HU) who underwent multiphase (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous phase) PCD-CT and for whom non-contrast and portal venous phase DE EID-CT was available. Subsequently, VNC reconstructions were calculated for all contrast phases and density as well as contrast enhancement within the cysts were measured and compared. MRI and/or ultrasound served as reference standards for lesion classification.Results19 patients (1 cyst per patient; age 69.5 ± 10.7 years; 17 [89.5%] male) were included. Density measurements on PCD-CT non-contrast and VNC reconstructions (arterial and portal venous phase) revealed no significant effect on HU values (p = 0.301). In contrast, a significant difference between non-contrast vs. VNC images was found for DE EID-CT (p = 0.02). For PCD-CT, enhancement for VNC reconstructions was < 20 HU for all evaluated cysts. DE EID-CT measurements revealed an enhancement of > 20 HU in five lesions (26.3%) using the VNC reconstructions, which was not seen with the non-contrast images.ConclusionPCD-CT-derived VNC images allow for reliable and accurate characterization of simple cystic renal lesions similar to non-contrast scans whereas VNC images calculated from DE EID-CT resulted in substantial false characterization. Thus, PCD-CT-derived VNC images may substitute for non-contrast images and reduce radiation dose and follow-up imaging.