Abstract

The Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 simplified the definition of threshold growth to '≥50% size increase in a mass in ≤6 months. However, the diagnostic value of threshold growth for HCC remained unclear. We evaluated the value of threshold growth, as defined by the LI-RADS v2018, in diagnosing HCCs. Patients who underwent preoperative gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI because of the presence of LI-RADS category 2, 3, or 4 rather than category 5 on prior CT/MRI between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Pathologic or clinical diagnoses were used as reference standards. Imaging features were evaluated by three readers according to LI-RADS v2018. The frequency and diagnostic odds ratio of threshold growth were calculated. The diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 was separately evaluated when threshold growth was and was not considered a major feature, and results were compared using generalized estimation equations. Subgroups of patients who underwent CT/MRI during the previous 3-6 months were analyzed. Analysis of 340 observations in 243 patients found that the frequency of threshold growth was 18.8% and it gradually increased over time. Threshold growth was significantly associated with HCC 5.2 (95% confidence interval=2.1-12.7; p<0.001). Use of threshold growth as a major feature significantly increased sensitivity in both the overall (66.4% vs. 57.3%, p<0.001) and subgroup (73.4% vs. 58.2%, p<0.001) cohorts, but had no effect on specificity in either the overall (97.5% vs. 98.3%, p=0.319) or subgroup (95.9% vs. 98.0%, p=0.323) cohorts. The revised threshold growth of LI-RADS v2018 was significantly associated with HCC. Use of threshold growth as a major feature can improve the sensitivity for diagnosing HCC. We found that the revised threshold growth in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 was a significant predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The use of threshold growth as a major imaging feature significantly increased the sensitivity of diagnosing HCC, especially small HCC (≤3.0cm), compared with its non-use. Because these small HCCs are eligible for curative treatments, the additional detection of small HCCs would be clinically meaningful.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.