Value of the american college of cardiology/american heart association stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990s

Abstract

The goal of this study was to reassess the accuracy of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) stenosis morphology classification for predicting coronary intervention success and complications in the era of new devices. Previous studies performed in the early part of this decade for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease found that these criteria were predictive of success rates but not complication rates. Data for 957 consecutive coronary interventions in 1,404 lesions from June 1994 to October 1996 were prospectively classified according to ACC/AHA guidelines and entered into a database. Ninety-one and 9 10 of coronary interventions were successful, defined as <50% residual stenosis of each vessel attempted in the absence of major in-hospital complications, including Q-wave myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, need for emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, or death. Success rates did not differ between A (186 of 193, 96.3%), B1 (211 of 221, 95.5%), and B2 (676 of 711, 95.1%) lesions, but each was more successful than C (246 of 279, 88.2%) lesions (p <0.003, p < 0.004, and p = 0.0001, respectively). The class of lesion (A, B, or C) did not predict device (atherectomy, rotablator, and stent) use but specific morphologic characteristics of lesions within these classes were predictive of which device was used. Multiple regression analysis revealed that total occlusion and vessel tortuosity were predictive of procedure failure. Lesion type (A, B, or C) was not predictive of complications, but bifurcation lesions (p = 0.0045), presence of thrombus (p = 0.0001), inability to protect a major side branch (p = 0.0468), and degenerated vein graft lesions (p = 0.0283) were predictive. Thus, the ACC/AHA grading system is predictive of successful coronary intervention outcome, particularly of C-type characteristics, but not of complications or device success rate and selection. Although lesion type (A, B, or C) was not predictive of complications, specific lesion morphologies were predictive of adverse events and device use.