Abstract

Abstract. We investigated the contribution of medium range weather forecasts with lead times of up to 14 days to seasonal hydrologic prediction skill over the conterminous United States (CONUS). Three different Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) based experiments were performed for the period 1980–2003 using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrology model to generate forecasts of monthly runoff and soil moisture (SM) at lead-1 (first month of the forecast period) to lead-3. The first experiment (ESP) used a resampling from the retrospective period 1980–2003 and represented full climatological uncertainty for the entire forecast period. In the second and third experiments, the first 14 days of each ESP ensemble member were replaced by either observations (perfect 14-day forecast) or by a deterministic 14-day weather forecast. We used Spearman rank correlations of forecasts and observations as the forecast skill score. We estimated the potential and actual improvement in baseline skill as the difference between the skill of experiments 2 and 3 relative to ESP, respectively. We found that useful runoff and SM forecast skill at lead-1 to -3 months can be obtained by exploiting medium range weather forecast skill in conjunction with the skill derived by the knowledge of initial hydrologic conditions. Potential improvement in baseline skill by using medium range weather forecasts for runoff [SM] forecasts generally varies from 0 to 0.8 [0 to 0.5] as measured by differences in correlations, with actual improvement generally from 0 to 0.8 of the potential improvement. With some exceptions, most of the improvement in runoff is for lead-1 forecasts, although some improvement in SM was achieved at lead-2.

Highlights

  • Droughts are among the most expensive natural disasters (Ross and Lott, 2003)

  • Over the conterminous United States (CONUS), Shukla and Lettenmaier (2011) found that initial hydrologic conditions (IHCs) generally dominate at short leads (i.e. 1–2 months), while climate forecast skill dominates for longer leads; IHCs can account for a substantial part of the total hydrologic forecast skill under some conditions for leads of as long as 6 months

  • Seasonal hydrologic/drought prediction systems, such as The National Centers for Environmental Prediction’s (NCEP) drought monitor and the University of Washington’s Surface Water Monitor, use IHCs generated by land surface models (LSMs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Droughts are among the most expensive natural disasters (Ross and Lott, 2003). Proactive risk-based approaches to drought management that include better monitoring, early warning and prediction are essential for mitigating drought losses (Schubert et al, 2007). Hou et al (2009) evaluated the Global Ensemble Forecast System of NCEP coupled with the Noah LSM for its ability to provide useful streamflow forecast skill They concluded that the coupled system had some positive streamflow forecast skill at lead times varying from 1–3 days for smaller basins and more than 7–10 days for large river basins. By merging MRWFs (∼ 14 day lead) with seasonal climate forecasts, seasonal hydrologic prediction skill could potentially be (i) improved at short lead times (∼ 1–2 months) and (ii) extended in time beyond what is derived solely from the IHCs, in those cases when climate forecasts at even short lead times have skill that is no better than climatological. We evaluate the additional forecast skill derivable from MRWFs in the context of hydrologic ensembles of monthly runoff and mean monthly soil moisture (SM) at leads from one to several months

Approach
LSM and forcing data
Weather forecasts
Forecast skill score
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call