Abstract

ABSTRACT In light of growing urban traffic, car parking becomes increasingly critical for cities to manage. As a result, the prediction of parking occupancy has sparked significant research interest in recent years. While many external data sources have been considered in the prediction models, the underlying geographic context has mostly been ignored. Thus, in order to study the contribution of geospatial information to parking occupancy prediction models, road network centrality, land use, and Point of Interest (POI) data were incorporated in Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN, specifically Feedforward Neural Network FFNN) prediction models in this work. Model performances were compared to a baseline, which only considers historical and temporal input data. Moreover, the influence of the amount of training data, the prediction horizon, and the spatial variation of the prediction were explored. The results show that the inclusion of geospatial information led to a performance improvement of up to 25% compared to the baseline. Besides, as the prediction horizon expanded, predictions became less reliable, while the relevance of geospatial data increased. In general, land use and POI data proved to be more beneficial than road network centrality. The amount of training data did not have a significant influence on the performance of the RF model. The ANN model, conversely, achieved optimal results on a training input of 5 days. Likely attributable to varying occupancy patterns, prediction performance disparities could be identified for different parking districts and street segments. Generally, the RF model outperformed the ANN model on all predictions.

Highlights

  • Finding a free parking space in urban areas can be a very challenging task

  • In order to study the contribution of geospatial information to parking occupancy prediction models, road network centrality, land use, and Point of Interest (POI) data were incorporated in Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN, Feedforward Neural Network FFNN) prediction models in this work

  • We focus on the prediction of on-street parking occupancy, which is more challenging than the occupancy prediction of off-street parking facilities due to the significant changes of the occupancy rates of parking street segments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

On average, parking search traffic, that is, vehicles roaming around looking for free parking spaces, amounts to as much as 30% of total traffic in certain urban areas (Zhang and Haghani 2015). In order to develop more adaptive traffic management and traveler information systems, the prediction of parking occupancy has received significant attention in recent years (Ermagun and Levinson 2018). In such a way, drivers can plan their trips ahead of time, allowing them to customize the destination and departure time. Once close to the destination, drivers can be guided directly to a vacant parking space

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call