Abstract

Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Objective To evaluate the quality of Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) information in predicting return to work (RTW). Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation clinic. Participants Patients (N=220) with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) conducting a medical rehabilitation. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Patients filled in questionnaires at admission and 1-year follow-up. An FCE was performed on admission. RTW was defined as a combination of employment at 1-year follow-up with a maximum of 6 weeks sick leave because of MSD in the postrehabilitation year. As predictive FCE information, the physical capacity (Dictionary of Occupational Titles categories 1–5), the number of test results not meeting work demands (0–25), and the tester's recommendation of work ability in the actual job (≥6h/d) were analyzed. Logistic regression models (crude and adjusted for the concurrent predictors employment, preadmission sick leave, and patient's prognosis of RTW) were created to predict RTW. Results Complete data were obtained for 145 patients. The sample showed a non-RTW at 1-year follow-up for 37.9%. All FCE information showed significant relations to RTW ( r=.28–.43; P<.05). In the crude as well as in the adjusted regression models, all FCE information predicted RTW, but the models' quality was low. The integration of FCE information led to an increase of 5%. The predictive efficiency was poor. The adjusted model for failed tests showed a substantial improvement compared with the reference model (concurrent predictors only). Conclusions There was a significant relation between FCE information and RTW with and without concurrent predictors, but the predictive efficiency is poor. Primarily, the number of failed tests seemed to be of significance for patients with ambiguous RTW prognosis. A first proposal for a prediction rule was discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.