Évaluation rétrospective de la pertinence des soins dans la prise en charge des tumeurs ovariennes présumées bénignes

Abstract

IntroductionThe relevance of care is defined by the right act, for the right patient, at the right time. We were interested in the relevance of the management of presumed benign ovarian tumors before and after the release of the CNGOF guidelines 2013 (French guidelines). MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study conducted at the University Hospital in Strasburg France from 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2017 including all patients treated for a presumed benign ovarian cyst. We were interested in the diagnostic approach: relevance of the prescribed imaging and the use of CA 125 dosage, in the therapeutic approach: the relevance of the technique used as well as the relevance of the surgical indication. We compared our practices between 2013 and 2017 for these same items. ResultsWe included 682 cysts for 621 patients, the imaging performed was relevant in 55% of cases, not relevant but justified in 25% and irrelevant in 20%. The CA 125 assay or its absence of assay was relevant in 84% of cases. The surgical technique was relevant in 67% of cases and not relevant but justified in 29%. With a significant improvement 7.1% in 2013 of irrelevant against 0.9% for the year 2017. The surgical indication was relevant in 72% of cases, not relevant but justified in 20% and irrelevant in 2.7%. ConclusionsThe analysis of the relevance of care allows an evaluation of our practices. Professional recommendations can have an impact on the quality of care.