Abstract

This paper explores the role of sentiment in style investing for a sample of eight Eurozone markets and makes a distinction between fundamentals-driven sentiment and sentiment based on non-fundamental information. We find that style returns are not stable overtime: on average, value portfolios tend to outperform growth portfolios, however, during financial crises the effect is either reversed or disappears. We also find that sentiment has a more significant effect on portfolio returns during financial crises. For example, for Germany during the US financial crisis, the variance of fundamental sentiment accounts for 19.65% of the value portfolio variance and the variance of non-fundamental sentiment for a further 24.67%. These results are robust to the choice of valuation ratios in defining investment style. Impulse Response Functions from a Panel Var model indicate that, on average, a shock to non-fundamentals driven sentiment has a negative effect on portfolio returns while a shock to fundamentals driven sentiment has a positive effect on returns.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.