Évaluation de nos pratiques professionnelles : apport des pansements hémostatiques dans l’hémostase de la fistule artério-veineuse ?

Abstract

IntroductionIn haemodialysis patients the length of bleeding times after fistula cannulation is an easy and fairly used method of monitoring vascular access. In the most cases, compression is performed manually by nurses and the use of haemostatic dressing is common. As data in the literature are scares, we have decided to develop a quality improvement program in our hemodialysis center to manage this issue. Material and methodsAfter informed consent, 35 hemodialysis outpatients were selected in order to study the bleeding time using haemostatic dressing or not during two weeks in a cross over schema. The dialysis schedule was unchanged and comparative analysis of parameters such as blood flow rate or anticoagulant treatment were done between the groups. ResultsCompression times with and without hemostatic dressing were not different (12.6 min and 12.9 min, respectively). Patients with an anticoagulation during the dialysis session greater than 0.35 IU/kg/session had a longer bleeding time (12.75 min vs 11.75 min; P=0.008). ConclusionIn our evaluation, the use of haemostatic dressings is not associated with a real shorter bleeding time. Their use generate an additional cost estimated on average at 164 euros/year/patient. Patients and team realized that compression time is important for fistula monitoring and using compresses does not really increase this time.